TECHNOCENTRIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL WOMEN: A FEMINIST TECHNOSCIENCE STUDY OF FEMALE ROBOTS IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION

Authors

  • Sara Kalsoom MPhil Scholar, Department of English Language & Literature, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan Author
  • Dr Rabia Khan Assistant Professor, Department of English Language & Literature, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Feminist Technoscience, Female Robots, Technocentric Representation, Gender Bias

Abstract

The assimilation of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics into practice in everyday life have created a lot of academic, cultural, and ethical controversy. The study of artificial women female coded robots and AI in modern fiction is one of the most eye-opening areas of research. The paper is grounded on the first aim of the overarching research project, which explores the technocentric portrayals of artificial women through exploring how fiction portrays female robots as an invention of technocentric thinking. This paper uses the Feminist Technoscience theory to examine how these two texts, Jeanette Winterson, Frankissstein (2019), and Julie Wosk, Alluring Androids, and Electronic Eves (2015), present a diagnosis of deep-seated gender biases that are ingrained in the design and imaginative work of technology, and how both works endorse and reinforce women as being hyper-feminized, subservient, and aesthetically idealized. As it is shown in this paper, these representations reflect the trends in AI in the real world, where female-coded assistants, service robots, and sex dolls are promoted as obedient, compliant, and responsive to emotions. Based on qualitative textual analysis and a broad range of feminist and posthumanist literature, the results indicate that unless AI development is critically addressed, it is likely to perpetuate past gender hierarchies in the name of being innovative. Placing these representations in the context of wider arguments about gender, technology, and power, the paper demands feminist, moral, and non-technocentric and non-patriarchal reimaginings of AI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.

Garland, A. (Director). (2014). Ex Machina [Film]. Universal Pictures.

Haraway, D. (1985). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.

Hoffmann, E. T. A. (1816). The Sandman.

Lang, F. (Director). (1927). Metropolis [Film]. Universum Film AG.

Levin, I. (1972). The Stepford Wives. Harper & Row.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2019). I’d Blush If I Could: Closing Gender Divides in Digital Skills through Education. UNESCO Publishing.

Winterson, J. (2019). Frankissstein: A Love Story. Jonathan Cape.

Wosk, J. (2015). Alluring Androids, Robot Women, and Electronic Eves: Stepford Wives and Other Women. University of Texas Press.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Sara Kalsoom, & Dr Rabia Khan. (2025). TECHNOCENTRIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL WOMEN: A FEMINIST TECHNOSCIENCE STUDY OF FEMALE ROBOTS IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 3(4), 96-108. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/219