ECOLOGICAL ERASURE AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE IN 2026 EUROPEAN HEATWAVE HEADLINES: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Hijab Aqdas MS Scholar, Department of Humanities, CUI, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Ihsan Ullah Independent Researcher and Academic Writer, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Johar khatoon MS Scholar, Department of Humanities, CUI, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Climate Change, Critical Discourse Analysis, Ecolinguistics, Ecological Stories, European Heatwaves, Newspaper Headlines

Abstract

This study investigates how international newspaper headlines present the 2026 European heatwaves and how these representations shape understandings of climate responsibility, vulnerability, and ecological harm. It examines how headlines assign or obscure agency, foreground particular consequences, erase non-human participants, and construct beneficial, ambivalent, or destructive ecological stories. A qualitative research design is adopted. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is utilised as the theoretical framework, while Stibbe’s ecolinguistic framework serves as the approach. The sample comprises 12 purposively selected European heatwave headlines published by The Guardian, Reuters, Al Jazeera, and DW. The headlines are analysed for ideology and representation, lexical choice and agency, silences and foregrounding, and recontextualisation and legitimation before being evaluated through Stibbe’s ecolinguistic concepts. The findings show that most headlines construct ambivalent ecological stories. They communicate the severity of extreme heat, legitimise scientific knowledge, and support emergency planning, cooling provision, public-health protection, and resilient infrastructure. However, they frequently represent heatwave, wildfires, and climate change as autonomous agents while backgrounding governments, fossil-fuel industries, corporations, regulatory failures, and carbon-intensive practices. Adaptation and coping are more prominent than mitigation, accountability, and ecological restoration, while vulnerable communities and non-human life are often generalised or erased. The study contributes to climate communication research by integrating CDA with ecolinguistics and demonstrates that environmental urgency does not necessarily produce ecologically responsible journalism. It recommends clearer attribution of responsibility and greater representation of inequality, ecological interdependence, and non-human consequences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell.

Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, H. Lee, & J. Romero, Eds.).

Liang, L., Wang, H., & Li, F. (2025). Representing the other: A critical discourse analysis of British media coverage of China's role in climate change. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1168.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. SAGE.

McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: A beginner's guide. SAGE.

Norton, C., & Hulme, M. (2019). Telling one story, or many? An ecolinguistic analysis of climate change stories in UK national newspaper

editorials. Geoforum, 104, 114–136.

Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world. WIREs Climate Change, 12(1), e675.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

Wang, W., & Downey, J. (2026). Have we reached a "tipping point" in climate change reporting? How mainstream newspapers cover heatwaves. Journalism Practice, 20(4), 1256–1281.

Zubair, M., & Almas, N. (2026). Ecological uncanny and fallout of repression: Exploring the metaphor of ecocatastrophe in The Light Pirate. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 1–11.

Zubair, M., Ali, S., & Batool, S. (2026). Climate change and hyperobjects: An ecocritical analysis of The Deluge by Stephen Markley. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(6), 619–634.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Hijab Aqdas, Ihsan Ullah, & Johar khatoon. (2026). ECOLOGICAL ERASURE AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE IN 2026 EUROPEAN HEATWAVE HEADLINES: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(3), 1023-1042. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/713