CONSTRUCTING THE CONFLICT: A COMPARATIVE CORPUS-ASSISTED CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (CA-CDA) OF MEDIA DISCOURSE IN PAK-AFGHAN BORDER CONFLICT OF 2025

Authors

  • Eman Sohail BS Scholar, Department of English, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Mishka Babar Abbasi BS Scholar, Department of English, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Dr. Kaukab Saba Lecturer at International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CA-CDA), Durand Line, Fairclough, Ideology, Legitimization, Pak-Afghan Conflict, Transitivity, Van Dijk

Abstract

The study conducts a comparative Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis (CA-CDA) of the selected media discourse on Pak-Afghan Border Clashes of 2025. The research investigates how the media of each country linguistically construct the conflict and what are the ideological implications of those constructions by analyzing the specialized corpora, constituting of online news reports and articles from Dawn and TOLOnews for Pakistan and Afghanistan respectively. The study uses Sketch Engine software for quantitative analysis to extract keyword lists for both Pakistani Corpus and Afghan Corpus. The generated keyword lists are used to extract key lemmas based on their statistical salience and discursive frames of securitization, blame, sovereignty, and legitimacy from the corpus. The study examines the collocational and concordance patterns of the selected lemmas. Furthermore, the research uses Fairclough's 3D model of CDA as its interpretative framework along with van Dijk's ideological square. The findings reveal the discursive differences in three areas: the grammar of blame evidenced through transitivity and nominalization, the construction of legitimacy and Illegitimacy done by labeling strategies, and the contestation of sovereignty, which manifest in the nature of border itself. The paper argues that the purpose of these contrasting discourses is not innocent, but rather a manifestation of state propaganda to justify state actions, entrench national identities, and foster conflict by closing common ground. Hence, this research contributes to the growing field of CA-CDA and highlights the mechanisms through which power and ideology is enacted in media discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, B. & Hussain, R. (2025). The representation of the Afghan Taliban government: a critical discourse analysis of Pakistani media reports. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2580442

Ali, Y., et al. (2020). Evaluation of effectiveness of fence on a country’s border: a case study of Pak-Afghan border fence. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(4), 769-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-020-00774-1

Aziz, H., Tari, M., & Iqbal, Z. (2025). Cross-Border Narratives: Pakistan’s image on Afghan Facebook. JRPSS, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULA0051

Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis. BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC.

Batool, S. (2019). Media representations and refugees crisis: Framing of Afghan refugees in mainstream print media of Pakistan. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 3 (1), 461-473.

Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman Inc., New York.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Longman Publishing.

Fatima, S.S., Khan, K., & Ahsan, M., (2021). The Process of Othering in Pakistani Newspapers. International Research Journal of Education and Innovation, 2(2), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.53575/irjei.27-v2.2(21)258-266

Kaleem, R. (2025). Pakistan Afghanistan Relations: Case Study of Land Border Management in Relation to National Security of Pakistan. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review. 3(1), 62-80.

Leech, G. (1991). The State of the Art in Corpus Linguistics. In A. Karin, & B. Altenberg (Eds.). English corpus linguistics. Routledge.

Mahmood, K. et al. (2023). Pak-Afghan border and regional stability: A perspective of Pakistan military. NUST Journal of International Peace & Stability. 6(2), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.37540/njips.v6i2.151

Marwan, A., & Naz, M. (2024). Representation of the fall of Kabul in Pakistani and Afghan media. Media, War & Conflict, 00(0), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241237926

McEnery, T., & Gabrielatos, C. (2006). English corpus linguistics. In. B. Aarts and A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 33-71). Blackwell Publishing.

Mushtaq, S., & Baig, F. (2015). Reporting Pak-Afghan Relations: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistani and Afghan Media. JRSP, 52 (2), 33-42.

Partington, A. et al. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company

Salih, M.H., Kunwal, F., & Aziz, M.T. (2025). Framing of the Pakistan–Afghanistan Border Conflict in Pakistani Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Sociology and Cultural Research Review, 4(2), 306-316.

Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Urooj, N., Naeem, W., & Furnaz, R. (2025). Constructing the 'Other' in Times of Crisis: A Critical Discourse Analysis of

Pakistani Media Narratives on the Repatriation of Afghan Refugees (Jan-June 2025), ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(3), 3671-3688. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.03.064

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H.E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485). Wiley-Blackwell.

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Eman Sohail, Mishka Babar Abbasi, & Dr. Kaukab Saba. (2026). CONSTRUCTING THE CONFLICT: A COMPARATIVE CORPUS-ASSISTED CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (CA-CDA) OF MEDIA DISCOURSE IN PAK-AFGHAN BORDER CONFLICT OF 2025. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(3 (s2), 619-643. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/677