THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ACADEMIC IMPACT OF THE SUPERIORITY OF ENGLISH ON PAKISTANI STUDENTS IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Keywords:
Academic Impact, AI Generative Tools, Autonomy, Basic Psychological Needs, Capitalism, Colonialism, Competence, English Superiority, Relatedness, ThwartingAbstract
English is perceived as a privileged status and social capital within the Pakistani educational institutes, producing a dominant linguistic hierarchy that inordinately affects students from a regional language background. This study aims to analyze the hierarchical linguistic landscape that thwarts students’ basic psychological needs, leading to negative outcomes. The unappeasable educational pressure to produce the perfect, errorless, and high-grade English output intended the students to use generative AI tools, which evidences linguistic imperialism. According to BPN, the basic needs of Self Determination are: Competence to confirm the mastery of English, relatedness, in order to relate with proficient English persons and academic environment, students use AI tools; autonomy, which is being reduced if students over-rely on AI tools. Hence, the capability of selfwriting. Moreover, the significance of the study is to explore the language-related issues faced by students in a multilingual environment, where one language dominates over others. Further, it also provides evidence-based recommendations to policymakers and teachers to alleviate the psychological and academic barriers imposed by the authorized status of the English language. This research uses a mixed methodology, quantitatively conducted among university students. This study analyzes the impacts of English dominance on students by employing Self-Determination Theory, Philipson’s Linguistic Imperialism, and Bourdieu’s theory of Linguistic Capitalism. The results confirmed the adverse impact of the supremacy of the English language on students’ academic and psychological conditions. The statistical data mirror that linguistic pressure shifts academic motivation from controlled autonomy of students, brought out by the thwarting of competence and relatedness.
Downloads
References
Bourdie, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (G. Raymond and M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Deci, E.L., &Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4),227-268
English language learners (Honors thesis, University of Southern Mississippi). Aquila Digital Community https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/879
Joseph, J.E. (2004). Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kim, J., Lee, S.-S., Detrick, R., Wang, J., & Na, L. (2025). Students' generative AI interaction patterns and their impact on academic writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6
King, L. (2022). Linguistic imperialism: A critical analysis of English hegemony and its effect on
Mehawesh, M.I. (2014). The Socio-Semiotic Theory of Language and Translation: An overview. International Journal of Languages and Literatures,2 (2),251-269. American Research Institute for Policy Development
Mesthrie, R. (2000). Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. Routledge.
Mirza A., Hafeez, S., & Fatima, A. (2024). Analyzing the impact of English dominance on Urdu language pedagogy in Pakistani universities. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(2), 293-306.
https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-11)26
Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M.,&Yusoff, K.(2024).British colonial education in the Indian subcontinent (1757-1858): Attitude of Muslims. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.02
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistics Imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Shamim, F. (2008). Trends, issues, and challenges in English language education in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802267324
Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Zahra, S.M., Jameel, E., & Hussain, Z. (2025). The influence of generative AI on academic writing: A qualitative study of teachers ‘perspectives and digital literacy in Pakistani universities. Guman 8 (1), 1-25. https://guman.com.pk/index.php/GUMAN
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farakh Kainat, Zainab Mahmood, Ariba Habib, Dr. Kaukab Saba (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
