CHALLENGES OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND THREATS TO NATIONAL SECURITY OF PAKISTAN: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/fbasyg51Keywords:
Climate Change, Climate-Security Nexus, Community Resilience, Critical Discourse Analysis, Food Security, National Security, Pakistan, Water SecurityAbstract
Pakistan is burning, flooding, starving and drowning, all at the same time and all due to a crisis that it hardly contributed to create. The research paper proposes a strictly-evidenced, mixed-method analysis of the compounding problems that climate change presents to the national security of Pakistan. To create a comprehensive picture of the economic, developmental, and humanitarian cost of climate change in Pakistan, the study uses only authoritative international institutional sources published between 2020 and 2025 - namely the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Risks Report series, and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Human Development Reports Such quantitative results are then interpreted by a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of the most meaningful climate and security policy texts in Pakistan, such as the National Security Policy 2022-26 as well as the National Climate Change Policy 2021, the aim of which is to reveal the discursive fractures and institutional misalignments that do not allow the country to develop an effective whole-of-government response to. The article critically analyses how climate change alters and magnifies the threats on the food security, water resource management, energy provision, economic stability, population health and internal displacement dimensions. One of the main areas of analysis is the recognition and criticism of the discursive bifurcation between the security governance architecture in Pakistan that has traditionally been concerned with conventional military threats and its climate governance structure that functions within a rather technical, developmental register that has little to do with national security planning. The paper contends that this bifurcation itself is a first-order failure of governance, with second-order material implications on social stability, state legitimacy, and national sustainability. The conclusion does not follow the typical structure of research papers but presents a substantive and implementable synthesis of evidence-based policy frameworks both at a national and international level and community-level intervention strategies aimed at fostering adaptive capacity at the ground level. These suggestions are informed by UNDP, World Bank, and ADB programmatic evidence and are tuned to the unique institutional, socioeconomic, and geopolitical situation of Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Abid, M. A., & Abid, M. B. (2023). Climate change and the increased burden of dengue fever in Pakistan. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 23(1), 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00808-8
Asian Development Bank. (2023). Climate change and food security in Asia and the Pacific: Risks, impacts, and adaptation responses. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2023). Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: Pakistan climate resilience country profile 2023. Asian Development Bank.
Asian Development Bank. (2023). Pakistan: Country partnership strategy 2021–2025, climate mainstreaming assessment. Asian Development Bank.
Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Eckstein, D., Kunzel, V., & Schafer, L. (2021). Global Climate Risk Index 2021: Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Germanwatch.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694440
Food and Agriculture Organization & World Food Programme. (2023). Pakistan: Acute food insecurity situation overview. FAO/WFP.
Government of Pakistan. (2021). National Climate Change Policy 2021. Ministry of Climate Change.
Government of Pakistan. (2022). National Security Policy of Pakistan 2022–2026. National Security Division, Prime Minister's Office.
Government of Pakistan. (2022). Pakistan floods 2022: Post-disaster needs assessment. Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiatives.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
International Monetary Fund. (2023). Pakistan: Staff report for the 2023 Article IV consultation and request for stand-by arrangement (Country Report No. 23/416). International Monetary Fund.
International Monetary Fund. (2023). Resilience and Sustainability Trust: Program design and engagement with climate-vulnerable countries — Pakistan case. International Monetary Fund.
McDonald, M. (2018). Climate change and security: towards ecological security? International Theory, 10(2), 153–180. doi:10.1017/S1752971918000039
Rasul, G., & Sharma, B. (2014). Water, Food, and Energy Nexus in South Asia: Implications for Adaption to Climate Change. Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9_81-1
Sultana, F. (2021). Climate change, COVID-19, and the co-production of knowledges. Political Geography, 88, Article 102438.
United Nations Development Programme Pakistan. (2023). Disaster risk reduction and climate resilience in Pakistan: Progress, gaps, and forward pathways. UNDP Pakistan Country Office.
United Nations Development Programme. (2022). The climate promise: Pakistan's revised Nationally Determined Contribution — implementation support assessment. UNDP.
United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human development report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock — reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. UNDP.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
World Bank. (2021). Groundswell: Acting on internal climate migration (Part II). World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2022). Pakistan poverty assessment 2022: Recession, floods, and the road to resilient growth. World Bank Group.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Fostering effective energy transition 2023: Benchmarking energy system performance.
World Economic Forum. (2024). The global risks report 2024 (19th ed.).
World Food Programme & Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). Pakistan: Joint acute food security assessment — July 2023.
World Health Organization. (2023). Pakistan flood response: Health cluster situation report and public health emergency assessment.
WHO Pakistan Country Office.
Yousuf J, Mehmood H, Aquil S, Rija A, Syyeda Rahmat Z, Malikzai A. Effects of floods on the mental health of Pakistanis: a commentary.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 11;85(5):2253-2255. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000590. PMID: 37229015; PMCID: PMC10205206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abid Ghafoor Chaudhry, Dr. Muhammad Munir (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
