SLOW VIOLENCE AND WAR: A COMPARATIVE ECOCRITICAL STUDY OF THE BLIND MAN’S GARDEN AND NO SPACE FOR FURTHER BURIALS

Authors

  • Qudsia Ansar MPhil Scholar, Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Syed Musharaf Hussain Shah COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Vehari Campus, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Dr. Sajid Ali Associate Professor, Department of English, Govt. Municipal Graduate College, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Ecocriticism, Environmental Degradation, No Space For Further Burials, Slow Violence, The Blind Man's Garden, War Literature

Abstract

This study offers a comparative ecocritical analysis of Nadeem Aslam's (2013) The Blind Man’s Garden and Feryal Ali Gauhar's (2007) No Space for Further Burials through the lens of  Nixon's (2011) perspective derived from Slow Violence and Environmentalism of the Poor. The study explores how these narratives depict the gradual yet devastating environmental degradation caused by prolonged conflict, a phenomenon often overlooked in traditional discourse. Both novels highlight the inseparable bond between human suffering and ecological destruction, illustrating how war obliterates not only the physical landscapes but also the cultural, moral, and social fabrics of society against the backdrop of the post-9/11. The research identifies key findings: first, the representation of slow violence as a pervasive and insidious force that extends the horrors of war beyond immediate human casualties to the environment; second, the novels' portrayal of the interconnectedness of human and ecological suffering, suggesting that the damage inflicted on nature is a reflection of the violence within humanity; and third, the role of historical and cultural contexts in shaping the narratives, the enduring impact of colonialism and global conflicts on contemporary ecological crises. These findings emphasize the urgency of addressing the environmental consequences and societal degeneration caused by wars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslam, N. (2013). The blind man's garden. Faber & Faber.

Coelho, P. (1988). The Alchemist, translated by Alan R. Clarke.

Gauhar, F. A. (2010). No Space for Further Burials. Akashic Books.

Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press.

Hamid, M. (20122000). Moth smoke . Farrar, Straus and Giroux ; Riverhead Books.

Hamid, M. (2012). Moth smoke. Penguin.

Khan, U. A. (2012). Thinner than skin. Interlink Publishing.

Love, G. A. (1990). Revaluing nature: Toward an ecological criticism. Western American Literature, 25(3), 201-215.

Makhdoom, M., & Yaqoob, M. (2019). Environmental Discourse: A Comparative Ecocritical Study of Pakistani and American Fiction in English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 260-267.

Makwana, H. P. (2016). Ecocritical approach to Paulo Coelho’s The Alchemist. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 4(4), 407-410.

Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press.

Rabani, G., & Mishra, B. (2024). Exploring Ecological Crisis: A Study of Climate Change in Uzma Aslam

Khan’s Thinner Than Skin. KEMANUSIAAN: The Asian Journal of Humanities, 31(1).

Rahman, S. (2023). Animals, others, and postcolonial ecomasculinities: Nadeem Aslam’s The Blind Man’s Garden. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 58(1), 197-212.

Shah, M. R. (2015). Eco-criticism in the poems of Kalidasa. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development,2(1), 258-262.

Toynbee, A. (1976). Mankind and Mother Earth: a narrative history of the world.

Yaqoob, M. (2010). Human perversion and environmental space: An ecocritical reading of Mohsin Hamid’s moth smoke. International Research Journal of Arts & Humanities (IRJAH), 38(38).

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Ansar, Q., Shah, S. M. H. ., & Ali, D. S. . (2025). SLOW VIOLENCE AND WAR: A COMPARATIVE ECOCRITICAL STUDY OF THE BLIND MAN’S GARDEN AND NO SPACE FOR FURTHER BURIALS. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 3(1), 282-300. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/63