CLASS, POWER AND EXPLOITATION IN DARWENT’S THE THINGS WE DO TO OUR FRIENDS: A MARXIST PRESPECTIVE

Authors

  • Mahwish Abid MPhil Scholar, Department Of English Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Sara Anam Lecturer, Department Of English Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Capitalism, Class Hierarchy, Dark Academia, Exploitation, Heather Darwent, Marxism, Power, The Things We Do To Our Friends

Abstract

This paper discusses the hierarchy of classes, power and exploitation in the Heather Darwent text, the things we do to our friends using a Marxist approach to literature. The study centers on an analysis of how economic inequality influences social relationship and power accessibility to a working-class student, Clare that aims to become accepted in an elite social circle. Applying qualitative textual analysis, the main Marxist ideas of classes struggle, ideology, exploitation, alienation, and commodification, the research demonstrates how wealth is used as a social control mechanism and strengthens the privilege. The results emphasize the way in which the capitalist ideology fosters the desire to belong to the elite and conceals the social mobility obstacles. The social and psychological implications of inequality of classes are revealed in the novel, which is the criticism of modern capitalistic society and the long-lasting role of economic privileges in the relations between human beings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser, Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127–186). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Darwent, H. (2023). The things we do to our friends. London, England: Viking.

Dobson, A. S. (2018). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media and self-representation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and literary criticism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative? Winchester, England: Zero Books.

Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the “sexualization of culture” to #MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8), 1313–1324.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). New York, NY: International Publishers.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Jameson, F. (1981). The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Littler, J. (2018). Against meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility. London, England: Routledge.

Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867)

Marx, K. (2007). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed., R. C. Tucker, Ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Tyler, I. (2020). Stigma: The machinery of inequality. London, England: Zed Books.

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Mahwish Abid, & Sara Anam. (2026). CLASS, POWER AND EXPLOITATION IN DARWENT’S THE THINGS WE DO TO OUR FRIENDS: A MARXIST PRESPECTIVE. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(6), 30-42. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/602