CONTEXTUALISING THE NEXUS IN URDU-ENGLISH PROVERBS AND IDIOMATIC PARALLELS: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PRAGMATIC TENDENCIES
Keywords:
Discourse Analysis, Gender Roles, Metaphorical Language, Politics, Proverbs And Idioms, Public Perception, SocietyAbstract
Proverbs and idioms have been critically analyzed through discourse analysis in a societal and political context in this whole research. This research uncovers paradoxical links between these linguistic units. Investigation of language, meaning they convey, and the complexities these linguistic maxims hold in themselves, which have their impact in societal and political contexts. Proverbs and idioms are also renowned as figures of speech. They are a combination of all these elements: give-and-take wisdom, cultural inheritance, beliefs, values, and societal norms. We analyzed their influence on people, politicians, and their mindsets. We investigated how they challenge established stereotypes and favor societal norms. The main goal was to get familiar with cultural and political significance by analyzing meaning and structure. We analyze these linguistic units through various concepts like George Orwell's concept of "inverted logic" and Simone de Beauvoir's viewpoints about gender roles. Through this research, we justify that these linguistic units share cultural values, criticize power dynamics and their political influence. These theoretical frameworks help us to prove that these linguistic units are a tool of both unity and conflict. So, this whole research verifies the role of metaphorical language and how it brings societal changes and shapes public perceptions.
Downloads
References
Abid, M. J. (2012). The Art of Opposition: Progressive Politics and Poetry from 1931-47 (Doctoral dissertation).
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110-122). Routledge..
Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. Springer.
Charteris‐Black, J. (1995). Proverbs in communication. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural
Development, 16(4), 259-268.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. routledge.
de Beauvoir, S. (2014). The second sex. In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology (pp. 118-123). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Textual analysis for social research.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Honeck, R. P. (1997). A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. Psychology Press.
Kiani, S., Umar, L., & Sultan, A. (2023). Gendered language: A critical discourse analysis of Pakistani dramas. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), 4349-4357.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in society, 2(1), 45-79.
Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook.
Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge University Press.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political metaphor analysis.
Norrick, N. R. (1985). How proverbs mean: Semantic studies in English proverbs (Vol. 27). Walter de Gruyter.
Orwell, G. (1946). Politics and the English Language and.
Orwell, G. (1984). George Orwell 1984. G Orwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & society, 17(3), 359-383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nouman Qadir, Hafiz Muhammad Awais, Muhammad Sulman Khan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
