AN ANALYSIS OF ESL WRITING ERRORS AT THE MATRIC LEVEL: TYPES, CAUSES, AND PEDAGOGICAL SOLUTIONS IN DISTRICT NAUSHEHRO FEROZE, SINDH

Authors

  • Shuhban Ali Siyal MS Scholar in Linguistics, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (MUET) Author
  • Nadia Brohi BS Applied Linguistics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Shaheed Benazirabad. (SBBU, SBA) Author
  • Saba Khizree BS Applied Linguistics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Shaheed Benazirabad. (SBBU, SBA) Author
  • Shoukat Usman MS Scholar in Linguistics, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (MUET) Author
  • Irshad Magsi MS Scholar in Linguistics, Quaid-e-Awam University of Science and Technology (QUEST) Author

Keywords:

Causes, Error Analysis, Metric-level Students, Solution

Abstract

This study investigates the types, causes, and solutions of errors in English writing among matric-level ESL learners in District Naushehro Feroze, Sindh. The study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Data were collected through written compositions (n = 30) and semi-structured interviews (n = 5) with English-language teachers from selected public-sector schools. Students were asked to write paragraphs in a controlled classroom environment to identify common writing errors, while teachers’ perspectives were explored to understand the basic causes and possible pedagogical solutions. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage), whereas qualitative data were analyzed thematically following Braun and Clarke (2006). The findings revealed a total of 757 errors across nine categories, with punctuation (20.73%), subject–verb agreement (16.91%), and spelling (12.02%) as the most frequent error types. Thematic analysis identified key contributing factors, including weak grammatical knowledge, mother-tongue interference, limited reading and writing practice, and overgeneralization of grammatical rules. Drawing on Corder’s Error Analysis framework (1982), the study highlights that such errors reflect developmental stages in second language learning. This study also suggested practical strategies such as strengthening grammar foundations, promoting reading habits, regular writing practice, and effective corrective feedback. The study also provides directions for future research in ESL writing at the school level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Mwber, A. S., Aburawi, A. M., & Aljamal, S. A. (2025). Difficulties and Challenges Faced by Students while Writing Essays in English: Difficulties and Challenges Faced by Students while Writing Essays in English. مجلة القلعة, (24-مارس), 42-63.‎

Amara, N. (2021). The importance of correcting students' errors in EFL.Journal of Languages and Translation,1(1), 16-22.

Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning?.Language learning,24(2), 235-243.

Bouira, I. (2025).Investigating The Challenges of Teaching and Learning Writing Skills in The Algerian Primary Schools(Doctoral dissertation, Ministry of Higher Education).

Brown, B. L. (1980). Effects of speech rate on personality attributions and competency evaluations. InLanguage(pp. 293-300). Pergamon.

Corder, S. P. (1982). Error analysis and interlanguage (Vol. 198, No. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dehghan, A. (2025). Empowering Autonomy in Language Learning: The Transformative Potential of Data-Driven Learning (DDL) in Higher Education. InEmancipatory Education Without Boundaries in the Age of Neoliberalism, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Learning Platforms(pp. 195-205). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Djalalovna, R. S. (2025). THE CRITICAL ROLE OF GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURES IN TECHNICAL TEXTS.Новости образования: исследование в XXI веке,3(32), 621-632.

Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (2014). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. InTutorials in bilingualism(pp. 53-83). Psychology Press.

Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. InCorrective feedback in second language teaching and learning(pp. 3-18). Routledge.

Hapsari, N. E., & Fauziati, E. (2018).Corrective Feedback In Students’ English Composition: A Case Study At SMP Muhammadiyah 7 Surakarta(Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Hussain, M., & Abdullah, R. (2019). An analysis of undergraduate Saudi EFL female students' errors in written English essays. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue: The Dynamics of EFL in Saudi Arabia.

Hussain, Z., Saeed, M., & Zeb, S. (2021). An error analysis of L2 writing of O-Level students in Pakistan.Asian EFL Journal,28(1.3), 185-205.

Hyland, K. (2019).Second language writing. Cambridge university press.

Jabeen, S. S., Majeed, A., & Abbas, S. (2025). Examining the Perceptions and Practices of English Teaching Methods in Pakistani Educational Institutions.Social Science Review Archives,3(3), 976-984.

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Kamlasi, I. (2017). Grammatical errors in writing of the second class students of SMA Kristen 1 Soe.The Journal of English Language and Literature.

Kanwal, U. (2025). Analysis of English Language Errors of Pakistani Dyslexic Students at Elementary Level. Wah Academia Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 1807-1836.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications.(No Title).

Lennon, P. (2008). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, interlanguage. Bielefeld Introduction to Applied Linguistics. A Course Book. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 51-60

Llach, M. D. P. A. (2011).Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing(Vol. 58). Multilingual Matters.

Nazar, S., & Nordin, N. R. M. (2024). Grammaticality in writing skills of L2 English learners: Challenges in the Pakistani academic setting.Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 517-533.

Qureshi, S., Bano, I., ur Rehman, S., & Qadir, S. (2025). INVESTIGATING THE INFLUENCE OF URDU LINGUISTIC FEATURES ON SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A FOCUS ON GRAMMAR, VOCABULARY, AND SYNTAX. International Journal of Social Sciences Bulletin, 3(10), 483-497.

Richards, J. C. (1980). Second language acquisition: Error analysis.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,1, 91-107.

Shamim, F., & Rashid, U. (2019). The English/Urdu-Medium Divide in Pakistan: Consequences for Learner Identity and Future Life Chances. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 43-61.

Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? L: A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian, and Bulgarian.International Journal of Applied Linguistics,8(2), 163-185.

Weireesh, S. (1991). How to analyze interlanguage. Journal of Psychology & Education,9(1), 13-22.

Zafar, A. (2016). Error analysis: A tool to improve the English skills of undergraduate students.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,217, 697-705.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Shuhban Ali Siyal, Nadia Brohi, Saba Khizree, Shoukat Usman, & Irshad Magsi. (2026). AN ANALYSIS OF ESL WRITING ERRORS AT THE MATRIC LEVEL: TYPES, CAUSES, AND PEDAGOGICAL SOLUTIONS IN DISTRICT NAUSHEHRO FEROZE, SINDH. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(2), 673-697. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/509