WATER AS A CAPITALIST COMMODITY IN THE CAPITALOCENE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PAOLO BACIGALUPI’S THE WATER KNIFE

Authors

  • Mussab Iqbal M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Linguistics and Literature, University of Haripur, Pakistan. Author
  • Faiza Khan Lecturer, English Department, Government Postgraduate College for Women, Haripur, KP, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Capitalocene, Climate Fiction, Eco-criticism, Environmental justice, Water Scarcity

Abstract

This paper presents the theoretical analysis of The Water Knife by Paolo Bacigalupi (2015) with the use of the Capitalocene to prove that water scarcity in the novel does not appear as a natural or a purely climatic crisis, but a structural result of capitalistic accumulation. Taking the idea of Jason W. Moore about capitalism as an ecological regime, the paper will analyze the way in which water is converted into an ecological common to a commodity and a legally regulated property. The paper reveals the ways in which senior water rights, corporate governance, and juridical abstraction restructure the ecological flows, resulting in the creation of dispossession, inequality, and violence through close textual analysis. The novel shows water as commodity, infrastructure and weapon by revealing how capitalist enclosure alienates ecological systems to lived experience. By placing The Water Knife into current discourses of climate justice and privatization of resources, this paper develops an ecocritical approach to predict the future as a result of the Capitalocene, in which environmental disaster is a systematic outcome rather than an external shock.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrecht, G. A. (2019). The Psychoterratic in the Symbiocene: Positive Earth Emotions. In Earth Emotions: New Words for a New World (pp. 91–129).

Bacigalupi, P. (2015). The Water Knife (First edition). Alfred A. Knopf

Belsey, C. (2005). Textual analysis as a research method. In E. G. Griffin, Research Methods for English Studies (pp. 157-174). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research Designs. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 219.140. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Gleick, P. H. (2014). Water, Drought, Climate Change, and Conflict in Syria. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(3), 331–340. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24907379

Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Societies without Borders, 4(1), 94–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/187219108x388716

Leedy, P.D. and Ormond, J.E. (2010) Practical Research Planning and Design (9th Ed.). Pearson Education International, Boston.

Malik, A. (2014). The Dry Future in The Water Knife. JETIR, 5(12), 224–228224–228.

Moore, J. W. (2017). The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036

Nations, U. (2025). Water – at the center of the climate crisis | United Nations. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/water

Sheppard, T. (2019). Decoding the Dystopia of The Water Knife (Master's thesis, Western

Shohamy, H. S. (1995). Second Language Research Methods, Oxford University Press

Sydney University (Australia)).

Tang, Y. (2023). On Climate Writing in The Water Knife. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(1), 64-68.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Mussab Iqbal, & Faiza Khan. (2026). WATER AS A CAPITALIST COMMODITY IN THE CAPITALOCENE: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PAOLO BACIGALUPI’S THE WATER KNIFE. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(2), 503-515. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/482