LANGUAGE AND IDENTITY: HINDKO AS A CULTURAL LEGACY AMONG COMMUNITIES IN HAZARA DIVISION

Authors

  • Dr. Wajid Ali Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Adeela Bibi Lecturer Government Postgraduate College for Women Mandian Abbottabad Author
  • Sundus Abbasi Lecturer Government Postgraduate College for Women Mandian Abbottabad Author
  • Sajid Irshad Assistant Secretary Academics BISE, Abbottabad Author

Keywords:

Cultural, Communitiesm, Language, Identity, Hindko, Hazara

Abstract

Language plays a dominant part in individual’s identity. Language serves as a means of communication and an indicator of cultural endurance. This study explores the connection between language and identity through the lens of Hindko, a prominent language in the Hazara Division of Pakistan. It observes how Hindko functions not only as a linguistic system but also as a vital indicator of cultural heritage, social belonging, and historical continuity among its speakers. The paper highlights the ways in which Hindko reflects the traditions, values, and collective memory of the Hazara community strengthening a shared sense of identity. By analyzing sociolinguistic patterns, cultural practices, and community attitudes, the study highlights the importance of preserving Hindko as an intangible cultural asset. It argues that linguistic diversity is essential not only for cultural preservation but also for fostering inclusive identities in multicultural societies. Ultimately, the research indicates that Hindko as a key sign of cultural identity in Hazara Division, emphasizing the need for efforts in language promotion.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. Routledge.

Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.

Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). Academic Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a socialsemiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.

Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology and power: Language-learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Oxford University Press.

Shackle, C. (1980). Hindko in Kohat and Peshawar. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 43(3), 482–510.

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.

Woolard, K. A. (1989). Double talk: Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford University Press.

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Dr. Wajid Ali, Dr. Adeela Bibi, Sundus Abbasi, & Sajid Irshad. (2026). LANGUAGE AND IDENTITY: HINDKO AS A CULTURAL LEGACY AMONG COMMUNITIES IN HAZARA DIVISION. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(2), 463-472. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/478