METAPHYSICAL BEING OF HALLAJ AND ABSOLUTE IDEALISM OF HEGEL: AN ANALYTICAL PARADIGM

Authors

  • Dr. Muhamad Rizwan Junaid University of Management & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Khadija Naz Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Absolute, Being, Idealism, Metaphysics, Paradigm

Abstract

Hussain Bin Mansoor Hallaj is a towering personality in Islamic mysticism who was brutally murdered because of his famous proclamation ana al haq, while George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is undoubtedly, the most influential philosopher who has established a novel way of presenting traditional philosophical scholarship and furthermore, exhibited a deep and insightful contribution towards core philosophical issues. There is a sharp and vivid similarity midst problem of being as presented by Hallaj and the absolute idealism of Hegel; a critical review of both of these great thinkers, it appears that the analytical paradigm encircles the thought flow, of Hegel and Hallaj, stems out of same intellectual source. The rational process and procedural inferences of Hallaj and Hegel share numerous cohesion as both of them displayed a new way of thinking, a shrill sagacity of revolt from the outmoded schools of thoughts, transcendental excellence and self-annihilation. This paper is an initial attempt to interpret this relationship to pave the way towards better understanding of their contribution in the real sense of words.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1969). Hegel's Science of Logic. Allen & Unwin.

(1801). The Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy, p. 156. GW4, 6.23.7–21.

(1971). Philosophy of Mind. Oxford. Clarendon Press.

(1977) Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Clarendon.

(2001) Philosophy of Right, trans. S.W. Dyde. Kitchener. Batoche Books.

Aisha Abd-ar-Rehman. (2021), Al-Tawasin (Translated Version). Gece Kitapligi, New York.

Beer, R. (2011) The Martyrdom of Mansur al-Hallaj. Retrieved online on 22nd November, 2019 from https://www.tibetanart.com/Blog/Post.asp?ID=82

Hegel, G. & Pinkard, T. (2018). The phenomenology of spirit. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). "Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie"

http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Hegel,+Georg+Wilhelm+Friedrich

Huang, Y. (1996). God as Absolute Spirit: a Heideggerian Interpretation of Hegel's God-Talk. Retrieved online on 21st November 2019 from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231887758_God_as_Absolute_Spirit_a_Heideggerian_Interpretation_of_Hegel's_God-Talk

Knox, M. (2019). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved online on 21 November 2019 from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Georg-Wilhelm-Friedrich-Hegel

Laughland, J. (2016). Schelling versus Hegel: from German idealism to Christian metaphysics.

Leighton, J.A. (1896). Hegel’s conception of God. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 5, No. 6 pp. 601-618

Maududi, Abul Aala’ Tafhim al-Qur'an - The Meaning of the Qur'an. Retrieved online rom http://www.englishtafsir.com/

Oslon, A.M. (1992). Hegel and the Spirit: Philosophy as Phenomenology. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Pfleiderer, O. (1894) Philosophy of Religion. London, Williams and Norgate

Siep, L. (2014). Hegel on the Master-Slave Relation. Retrieved online on 12th November 2019 from http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2014/05/hegel-on-the-master-slave-relation/

Speirs, E.B., Saderson, J.B. (1895). Philosophy of Religion. London, Kegan Paul.

Sreekumar, N. (2006) Aspects of Western Philosophy. Retrieved online on 12th November 2019

Tunick, M. (2014). Hegel's Political Philosophy: Interpreting the Practice of Legal Punishment. Princeton University Press.

Wallace, W. (1973). trans. Logic of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Dr. Muhamad Rizwan Junaid, & Dr. Khadija Naz. (2026). METAPHYSICAL BEING OF HALLAJ AND ABSOLUTE IDEALISM OF HEGEL: AN ANALYTICAL PARADIGM. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(3), 41-60. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/460