LOSS, RISK, AND POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING:ANALYSING MACHIAVELLI’S, THE PRINCE THROUGH PROSPECT THEORY

Authors

  • Umm-e-Rubab Government Graduate College, Gojra Road, Jhang (Pakistan) Author
  • Muhammad Tayyib Aijaz Assistant Professor in English, Government Graduate College, Gojra Road, Jhang Author
  • Fatima Faiz MPhil Scholar, Government College University, Faisalabad Author

Keywords:

Behaviors, Leadership Stability, Loss Aversion

Abstract

This research studies Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince using Prospect Theory. The text addresses how leaders make decisions in the face of danger, loss, or the opportunity to learn something new. The premise of this study is that rulers usually want to protect their power and avoid events that could jeopardize their position. Prospect Theory also states that people fear losses more than they value rewards. The goal of this study is to demonstrate why Machiavelli's rulers prioritize avoiding loss over attaining expansion, and how they choose safer paths to safeguard their authority. This study employs a qualitative method, drawing on both primary and secondary sources. The Prince is the major text, with study papers, books, and articles serving as secondary sources. Prospect Theory is the primary framework for understanding rulers' reasoning and decisions. The findings indicate that rulers in The Prince frequently avoid risky behaviours because they consider losing power to be more harmful than missing out on a potential advantage. They strive to maintain stability, remove risks, and make prudent decisions. These findings clearly corroborate Prospect Theory's claim that fear of loss influences human behavior more than desire for gain.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. S. (2015). Morality and Politics with Reference to Machiavelli’s The Prince. European Scientific Journal, 11(17).

Becker, A. (2012). Rethinking Masculinity and Femininity in Niccolò Machiavelli’s Political Thought. L’homme, 23(2), 65–78.

Black, R. (2010). Machiavelli in the Chancery. The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, 31–47.

Buhse, C. (2024). “Beating Back the Past”: The Psychological Justifications of Violence in Toni Morrison’s Fiction.

Byerly, L. (2017). Archilochus’s Effect on the Homeric Hero: Tracking the Development of the Greek Warrior.

Carta, C. (2017). Gramsci and The Prince: Taking Machiavelli outside the realist courtyard? Review of International Studies, 43(2), 345–366.

Hampton, M. A. (2014). Toward an Ethical Response: Reader Complicity in Toni Morrison’s Beloved and Paradise.

Kahn, V. (1986). Virtù and the Example of Agathocles in Machiavelli’s Prince. Representations, 63–83.

Khan, K. E., & Bhatti, O. K. (2019). Finding a new prince for management science: The antithesis to the Machiavellian Prince. Is Ahlakı Dergisi, 12(1), 27–38.

Kremer, N. (2013). Rationale for The Prince. SANE Journal, 1(3), 5.

Ober, J. (2012). Thucydides as a prospect theorist. Princeton/Stanford Working Paper.

Ober, J., & Perry, T. J. (2014). Thucydides as a prospect theorist. Polis, 31(2), 206–232.

Oral, U. (2022). Machiavelli, The Prince and Political Communication. SDU Faculty of Arts & Sciences Journal, (57), 336–344.

Rojek, C. (2014). Niccolo Machiavelli, cultural intermediaries, and the category of achieved celebrity. Celebrity Studies, 5(4), 455–468.

STECKO, J. THE NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI CONCEPT. Aldona Migała-Warchoł, Marek Sobolewski: Analiza poziomu życia w miastach na, 153.

Published

2025-11-20

How to Cite

Umm-e-Rubab, Muhammad Tayyib Aijaz, & Fatima Faiz. (2025). LOSS, RISK, AND POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING:ANALYSING MACHIAVELLI’S, THE PRINCE THROUGH PROSPECT THEORY. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 3(5), 334-348. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/421