GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF AI: AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS AND THE PATH AHEAD FOR EFFECTIVE REGULATION

Authors

  • Zainab Irfan University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Sidra Haroon Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and Communications, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Global AI Governance, International Institutions, Artificial Intelligence, Regulation, Ethical AI, Global Governance Frameworks

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming global political, economic, and security frameworks, prompting critical inquiries regarding the sufficiency of current international governance systems. As AI technologies cross national boundaries via transnational data flows, defence uses, financial markets and public governance, regulatory methods focused solely on states have shown to be inadequate in managing their worldwide risks. This research assesses the efficacy of existing institutional frameworks for the global governance of AI, placing particular focus on the roles played by the OECD, UNESCO and the United Nations, as well as emerging regional and national regulatory approaches like the European Union’s AI Act, the market-driven strategy of the United States and China’s government-centred regulatory system. Using a qualitative research design based on systematic analysis of documents and policies, this paper investigates institutional preparedness, alignment of norms, and enforcement limitations in global AI governance spanning the years 2019 to 2024. The findings indicate considerable regulatory fragmentation, inconsistent application of ethical principles, and marked disparities in governance capabilities between developed and developing nations, resulting in a largely soft law regulatory landscape with limited enforceability.

 The study posits that effective global governance of AI necessitates improved institutional collaboration, regulatory compatibility, and inclusive participation from multiple stakeholders. It suggests strategic approaches to create a coherent and rights oriented global governance framework that harmonizes innovation with accountability, protects human rights, and encourages equitable involvement in the international regulation of artificial intelligence.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.

Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025). AI governance: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, 3265–3279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cihon, P., et al. (2021). The debate on centralized governance of artificial intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00287-1

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

European Union. (2024). Artificial intelligence act. Official Journal of the European Union.

Floridi, L. (2018). An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Floridi, L. (2022). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Gwagwa, A., et al. (2021). Decolonising AI governance. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00038-4

Kostka, G. (2023). China’s evolving AI regulations. MERICS. https://merics.org

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). AI risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD AI principles. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). State of implementation of the OECD AI principles. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

United Nations. (2023). Interim report of the high-level advisory body on artificial intelligence.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). AI governance implementation guidance.

Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the EU artificial intelligence act. Computer Law Review International.

Whittlestone, J., et al. (2021). Tension between openness and regulation in AI. AI and Society.

Published

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Zainab Irfan, & Sidra Haroon. (2025). GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF AI: AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS AND THE PATH AHEAD FOR EFFECTIVE REGULATION. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 3(6), 442-458. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/406