ECOLINGUISTIC DIMENSIONS IN MCCONAGHY’S MIGRATIONS (2020)

Authors

  • Labeeqa Baneen BS English Literature,Department of English Language and Literature, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Dr. Tahira Khanam Lecturer, Department of English Language and Literature, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Arctic Terns, Ecolinguistic dimension , Environmental Degradation, Personal Loss, Migration

Abstract

This research aims to deal with ecolinguistic dimensions (ED), analyzing the protagonist Franny Stone’s journey to track Arctic terns, in McConaghy’s Migrations(2020). The qualitative methodology with theoretical framework by Haugen, Stibbe, Steffenson and fill is adopted. It tries to explore the interconnection between loss, life and the Natural world. It also tries to find out how environment shapes language, considering physical factors that influence speaker’s perceptions and expressions regarding the world and humanity’s role within it. Even Arctic terns despite being endangered species took their journey from Arctic to Antarctica. Various ecolinguistic dimensions such as, semiotics, sociocultural, evolutionary, cognitive, emotional, scientific and critical, found in this research, highlight the reciprocal relationship between human and environment. This research through Ecolinguistic Dimensions (ED) such as symbolic, sociocultural, cognitive and natural highlights the need for the safety of Natural resources and shows the close relationship between personal loss and environmental degradation. It also found the rich use of ecolinguistic vocabulary to highlight the ethical necessities of environmental stewardship on Nature emphasizing the public responsibility to safeguard biodiversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, S. (2016). Language and ecology: A content analysis of ecolinguistics as an emerging research field. Ampersand, 3, 108-116.

Haugen, E. (2001). The ecology of language. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 57-66.

Laurie, J. (2023). Green Economy/Green Revolution: an ecolinguistic critical discourse analysis of South African political parties' public communications on climate change.

Love-Nichols, J. (2019). Towards an Environmental Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Style and Discourses of Conservation among Rural American Hunters and Fishers (Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Barbara).

Makkai, A. (1993). Ecolinguistics: toward a new** paradigm** for the science of language?

McConaghy, C. (2020) Migrations. New York, Flatiron Books.

Randerson, J. (2018). Weather as medium: Toward a meteorological art. MIT Press.

Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Harmon, D. (2017). Biological diversity and language diversity: parallels and differences. In The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 11-25). Routledge.

Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons. Language sciences, 41, 6-25.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Baneen, L., & Khanam, T. (2024). ECOLINGUISTIC DIMENSIONS IN MCCONAGHY’S MIGRATIONS (2020). International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 2(2), 116-123. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/32