ECOLOGICAL ECHOES: THE ENVIRONMENTALNARRATIVE IN RICHARD POWERS’ BEWILDERMENT

Authors

  • Ghulam Mohiuddin PhD Scholar, Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Samina Yasmin Lecturer, University of Education Faisalabad Campus, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Zainab Mukhtar MPhil, Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Anthropocentrism, Bewilderment, Ecocriticism, Environmental Degradation, Remedies, Richard Powers

Abstract

The earth, as the foundation of all forms of life, provides essential resources such as air, water, food, and shelter etc. However, the anthropogenic activities are badly devastating it and leading to severe environmental degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Hence, the current study is a wake-up call for the inhabitants of the earth. It, employing a qualitative research paradigm that is analytical, interpretive, and deductive, intends to unpack the environmental narrative in Richard Powers’ Bewilderment. Grounded in the ecocritical frameworks of Glotfelty and Ghosh, the findings highlight how the anthropocentric behaviors exacerbate environmental crises, including global warming, pollution, biodiversity crisis, ecological injustice, climate-related health diseases, and ecological displacement. The study advocates for confronting these anthropocentric behaviors by fostering sustainable practices. Key recommendations include rejecting militarism and violence, utilizing art for environment’s sake, reforming education to instill an eco-centric worldview, advancing environmental scientific research, restructuring socio-economic and political systems, implementing legal protections for non-human rights, holding committers of environmental crimes accountable, and establishing eco-friendly policies and diplomacy. The study is a crucial resource for future researchers and policymakers dedicated to safeguarding the earth from further devastation and restoring it to its pristine condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belsey, C. (2005). Textual analysis as a research method. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Research Methods for English Studies (pp. 157-174). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

Buell, L. (1995). The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.

Buell, L. (2001). Writing for an endangered world. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.

Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Chasek, P. S. (2004). Introduction: The global environment at the dawn of a new millennium. In P. S. Chasek (Ed.), The Global Environment in the Twenty-first Century (pp. 1-11). New Delhi, India: Manas Publications.

Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.

Glotfelty, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. xv-xxxvii). Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework: A systematic review of lessons from the field. International journal of higher education, 7(6), 44-53.

Meeker, J. (1974). Comedy of survival: Studies in literary ecology. New York, USA: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Murray, J. (2023). Using Critical Animal Studies to Read Climate Change Fiction: Literary Reflections and Provocations. English Academy Review: A Journal of English Studies, 39(2), 1-12.

Nahrung, J. P. (2019). Watermarks: Science fiction, mitigation and the Mosaic novel structure in Australian climate fiction [Doctoral thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia].

Pillai, A. A., & Kaushal, U. (2019). Research methodology- An introduction to literary studies. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 1(1), 1-11.

Powers, R. (2021). Bewilderment. London, UK: Hutchinson Heinemann.

Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and ecology: An experiment in ecocriticism. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 104-123). Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Stewart, G. (2022). Open-circuit narrative: Programmed reading in Richard Powers. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 55(3), 547-565.

Waggoner, B. M. (1996, January 17). The Holocene epoch. University of California, Berkeley. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/quaternary/holocene.php

Williams, R. (1973). The country and the city. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Wood, L. (2015). The environmental impacts of colonialism [Honors Program Thesis and Project, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, USA].

Published

2024-11-17

How to Cite

Ghulam Mohiuddin, Samina Yasmin, & Zainab Mukhtar. (2024). ECOLOGICAL ECHOES: THE ENVIRONMENTALNARRATIVE IN RICHARD POWERS’ BEWILDERMENT. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 2(2), 1-18. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/24