HYPER-FEMININITY IN ATWOOD’S THE HANDMAID’S TALE
Keywords:
Hyper-Femininity, Performativity, Panopticism, Oppression, GileadAbstract
This study explores the impact of female oppression and devaluation in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, focusing on how systemic control in the male-dominated society of Gilead distorts women's identities, particularly that of the protagonist, Offred. Through the lens of Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity and Michel Foucault’s concept of panopticism, this research examines how Gilead enforces a rigid, hyper-feminine identity that limits women’s roles to reproduction and submission. Butler’s idea that gender is not innate but shaped through repeated acts helps highlight how femininity in Gilead is performative and controlled. Foucault’s notion of constant surveillance supports this view, showing how internalized fear maintains order. The study argues that the women of Gilead are reduced to property, forced into roles that leave them discouraged, powerless, and humiliated. However, the research also reveals that this exaggerated femininity can serve as a subtle form of resistance. Atwood uses dystopia not only to criticize patriarchal expectations but to show how women, even under extreme oppression, find ways to assert identity and agency. Hyper-femininity, while initially a symbol of submission, becomes a space where defiance quietly takes root. The novel ultimately presents a complex picture of both control and quiet rebellion.
Downloads
References
Atwood, M. (1985). The handmaid’s tale. McClelland & Stewart
Belsey, C. “Textual analysis as a research method”. Gabriele Griffin, 2005, pp.157-74.
Butler, J. (1987a). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France. New York: Columbia University Press.
Butler, J. (1987b). Variations on sex and gender: Beauvoir, Wittig and Foucault. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 128–142). Cambridge: Polity.
Butler, J. (1988). Performativity acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. “Theatre Journal”, 40(04), 519-531.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: The discursive limits of ‘sex’. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House.
Foucault, M. The subject and power: afterword to Dreyfus and Rainbow Chicago: University of Chicago, 1982.
Geuss, R. (1999). Morality, culture, and history: Essays on German philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hammer, S. B. "The World as It Will Be? Female Satire and the Technology of Power in "the Handmaid’s Tale"." Modern Language Studies 20.2 (1990): 39-49. Print.
Irigaray, L. Women on the Market. This Sex Which is Not One. Trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.
Ketterer, D. "Margaret Atwood's "the Handmaid's Tale": A Contextual Dystopia ("La Servante Écarlate" De Margaret Atwood: Une Dystopie Contextuelle)." Science Fiction Studies 16.2 (1989): 209- 17. Print.
Klarer, M. (1995). Orality and literacy as gender-supporting structures in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, 28(4), 129-142. ProQuest. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
McKee, A. Textual analysis: A beginner’s guide. London: Sage publications, 2003.
Morton, S. (2003). Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Routledge.
Parringer, Patrick. “Book Review: The Handmaid’s Tale.” London Review of Books, March 1986
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ms. Farah Naz, Ms. Sahar Javaid, Ms. Zahida Rehman (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
