THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES AND AI-BASED LEARNING ASSISTANTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR METACOGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION

Authors

  • Irsa Tayyab MPhil Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Junaid Ashraf Directorate of IT Services, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Moneeza Aslam MPhil Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), AI-Based Learning Assistants (AILAs), Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), Metacognition, Goal-Setting, Monitoring, Reflection, Personalized Learning, Educational Technology, Learner-Centered Pedagogy

Abstract

The fast-paced incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the educational sector has redefined learning spaces, offering students adaptive support as well as personalized feedback. Although AI-based learning assistants (AILAs) have great potential for personalizing instruction, their ability to facilitate metacognition—thus self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies—is not well understood. This article explores the relationship between SRL and AILAs, with attention devoted to how learners' metacognitive monitoring, goal-setting, reflection, and awareness are affected by AI tools. By descriptive and analytical review, the research concludes that there are major opportunities and challenges and that AILAs could support metacognitive development if strategically combined with learner-centered pedagogies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002

Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes—Insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Hadwin, A. F., & Oshige, M. (2019). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially shared regulation of learning. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1651865

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kasneci, E., Seufert, T., Kasneci, G., & Kühnberger, K. U. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.

UNESCO. (2023). AI and education: Guidance for policymakers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Williamson, B., & Piattoeva, N. (2022). Education governance and datafication. In R. Lingard, G.

Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), Handbook of education policy studies (pp. 1–18). Springer.

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2020). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1674854

Woolf, B. P. (2021). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance.

In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Irsa Tayyab, Junaid Ashraf, & Moneeza Aslam. (2025). THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES AND AI-BASED LEARNING ASSISTANTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR METACOGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 3(2), 816-829. https://ipjll.com/ipjll/index.php/journal/article/view/185