BEYOND DUALISM: HUMANS AND NATURE IN A RHIZOMATIC FRAMEWORK IN SHAKESPEARE’S THE TEMPEST
Keywords:
Humans, Nature, Ecocriticism, Anthropocentrism, Biocentrism, RhizomeAbstract
Shakespeare’s play The Tempest presents prismatic approaches for human beings focusing on the representation of humanity’s relation with Nature. This article explores three central dimensions: how the play explores the tension between anthropocentrism and biocentrism, how Prospero, Ariel and Caliban embody various mindsets of human interaction with the natural world, and how its portrayal of reciprocity between humans and nature addresses the contemporary eco-critical debates. The study primarily argues that Shakespeare presents nature as a reciprocal force both generous and reactive while the characters in the play reflect humanity’s potentiality along with triad of responses towards Nature i.e., eco-phobia, exploitation and integration. By interweaving ecological concerns with human behavior, The Tempest suggests that human survival depends upon their fulfilling collective ethical responsibility in treating nature neither as master nor as an enemy nor as a servant but as an existential partner in a calibrated ecological existence.
Downloads
References
Alex, R. K. (2007). Essays in Ecocriticism. Sarup & Sons.
Brown, P. (1985). The Tempest and the discourse of colonialism in Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Cornell University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Estok, S., & Kim, W. (2013). East Asian ecocriticism’s: A Critical Reader. Springer.
Fanon, F. (2000). The Wretched of the Earth. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05194-3_4
Glotfelty, C. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Greenblatt, S. (1980). Royal characters: Prospero and the language of power. Critical Inquiry, 7(3), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1086/448184
Howarth, W. (1996). Some Principles of Ecocriticism.” The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. The University of Georgia Press: Athens.
Loomba, A. (1998). Gender, race, and colonialism in The Tempest. In S. Greenblatt & Love, G.A. (2011).
Shakespeare's Origin of Species and Darwin's Tempest. Configurations, 18, 121 - 140.
Morton, T. (2010b). The Ecological Thought. Harvard University Press.
Phelan, J. (1992). Mastery and negotiation in The Tempest. Comparative Drama, 26(3/4), 1–18.
Shakespeare, W. (2000). The Tempest. Cambridge University Press.
Skura, M. A. (1989). Discourse and the Individual: The Case of Colonialism in “The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 40(1), 42–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870753
Tennyson, A. (1895).In Memoriam. Ed. William Rolef. Houghton, Mifflin & Co.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Malik Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Yasmin Anjum (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.