ADEMIC WRITING CHALLENGES OF FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE STUDENTS FROM DIVERSE LINGUISTIC BACKGROUNDS: CAUSES, PATTERNS, AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68156/h8st9r41Keywords:
Academic Writing Challenges, ESL Learners, First-Year College Students, Linguistic Background, Writing DifficultiesAbstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the academic writing challenges faced by first-year college students from diverse linguistic backgrounds and to examine their causes, patterns, and pedagogical implications. A mixed-method research design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through a structured writing test and analyzed using an independent samples t-test, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews to explore students’ experiences and perceptions of academic writing. The findings revealed significant differences between Urdu-speaking and Punjabi-speaking students in five dimensions of academic writing: sentence structure, vocabulary, cohesion and coherence, paragraph development, and mechanical accuracy. The qualitative findings further indicated that language transfer, limited exposure to English, and insufficient writing practices were associated with these difficulties. This study contributes context-specific knowledge by comparing Urdu-speaking and Punjabi-speaking first-year college students and identifying significant differences across five dimensions of academic writing. These findings provide useful evidence for developing writing instruction that considers students’ different linguistic backgrounds in the Pakistani context. The study highlights the need for explicit writing instruction, increased opportunities for writing practice, and greater consideration of students’ linguistic backgrounds in classroom teaching. Although the study is limited by its relatively small sample size, it provides useful pedagogical insights for improving academic writing instruction in multilingual educational settings.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, A. T. H., Azmi, M. N. L., Hassan, I., Atek, E. S. E., & Jusoh,Z. (2021). Investigation into common errors in English writing among non-academic staff at a Malaysian public university. Arab World English Journal, 12(December), 446–461.
Aldabbus, S., & Almansouri, E. (2022). Academic writing difficulties encountered by university EFL learners. British Journal of English Linguistics, 10.
Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL students’ difficulties and needs in essay writing. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017) (pp. 32–42). Atlantis Press.
Bacha, N. N. (2012). Disciplinary writing in an EFL context from teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(2), 15–24.
Bani Younes, Z., & Albalawi, F. S. (2015). Exploring the most common types of writing problems among English language and translation major sophomore female students at Tabuk University. Asian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 7–26.
Burt, M. K., & Kiparsky, C. (1972). The gooficon: A repair manual for English. Newbury House.
Council of Writing Program Administrators. (2014). WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition. http://wpacouncil.org/positions/outcomes.html
Dissanayake, C. B., & Dissanayake, S. D. (2019). Common syntactic errors made by undergraduates in writing English as a second language. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 7, 1–8.
Farukh, A., & Vulchanova, M. (2015). L1, quantity of exposure to L2, and reading disability as factors in L2 literacy skills. In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 329–350).
Fatimah, N. (2019). Students’ needs for academic writing at the English education department. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(3), 161–170.
Fitrawati, F., & Safitri, D. (2021). Students’ grammatical errors in essay writing: A pedagogical grammar reflection. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.16128
Gautam, P. (2019). Writing skill: An instructional overview. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 2, 74–90.
Guesmi. (2018). Analysis of errors made by Tunisian third-year EFL students when using English prepositions at ISLT (Unpublished master’s thesis). High Institute of Languages.
Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 216–221.
Isma, A., Hermansyah, S., Ramadhani, Y. R., Lestari, I. W., Evenddy, S. S., Talenta, P. I., Sastri, L., Rasmin, L. O., Febrianto, A. R., & Pavita, M. D. A. (2023). Teaching English to 21st century learners (1st ed.). Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Javed, M., Juan, W. X., & Nazli, S. (2013). A study of students’ assessment in writing skills of the English language. Online Submission, 6(2), 129–144.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The academic literacies model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
Li, X., & Wang, J. (2020). The influence of linguistic competence on academic writing: A study of Chinese ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 894–919.
Mahmood, A., & Qamar, B. (2019). Second language academic writing challenges: A case study of Pakistani university students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 8(2), 34–47.
Mpepo, M. V. (2010). Some of the problems in first-year students’ academic writing in some SADC universities. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/ijhss.v1i1.62102
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case of inclusive practice. Multilingual Matters.
Zamel, V. (2017). Writing in a second language: From process to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tehreem Khadim, Prof. Dr. Ammara Farukh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
