WHEN MOTHERHOOD IS UNDER SURVEILLANCE: MATERNAL LOVE AND STATE POWER IN JESSAMINE CHAN’S THE SCHOOL FOR GOOD MOTHERS

Authors

  • Muhammad Bilal Saqlain MPhil Scholar, Department of English Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Sanniya Batool Senior lecturer, Department of English Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Abubakar Jamil MPhil Scholar, Department of English Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22032146

Keywords:

Biopolitics, Emotional Governance, Feminist Dystopia, Institutional Motherhood, Jessamine Chan, Maternal Surveillance, State Control

Abstract

This paper looks into the ways in which The School for Good Mothers (2022) by Jessamine Chan describes motherhood as a place of state surveillance and institutional control. Based on the works of Michel Foucault on the theories of surveillance, discipline and biopolitics, as well as feminist theories of motherhood, the research paper is an examination of how the maternal love and caregiving is turned into a regulated and measurable behavior. The article argues in a quite close text study that the novel not only represents motherhood as a regulated action managed by the state apparatus but also subjecting mothers to a strict criteria of care and emotional conduct. It is a commentary on the current parenting trend as it illustrates how anxiety, self-policing and loss of maternal autonomy are created through surveillance, bureaucracy and gendered expectations. Finally, the research shows that the motherly love turns out to be one of the major processes by which the institutional force controls the lives of women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York, NY: Routledge.

Andrejevic, M. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Atwood, M. (1985). The handmaid’s tale. Toronto, Canada: McClelland and Stewart.

Baccolini, R., & Moylan, T. (Eds.). (2003). Dark horizons: Science fiction and the dystopian imagination. New York, NY: Routledge.

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Chan, J. (2022). The school for good mothers. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.

Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. New York, NY: Free Press.

Esposito, R. (2008). Bios: Biopolitics and philosophy (T. Campbell, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Faircloth, C. (2014). Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, & J. Macvarish (Eds.), Parenting culture studies (pp. 25–50). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Gandy, O. H., Jr. (1993). The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Glenn, E. N. (1994). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C., & Macvarish, J. (2014). Parenting culture studies. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lupton, D. (2011). The politics of medicine: Surveillance, life-style and health. London, England: Sage Publications.

Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

O’Reilly, A. (2016). Matricentric feminism: Theory, activism and practice. Toronto, Canada: Demeter Press.

Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London, England: Free Association Books.

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Muhammad Bilal Saqlain, Sanniya Batool, & Muhammad Abubakar Jamil. (2026). WHEN MOTHERHOOD IS UNDER SURVEILLANCE: MATERNAL LOVE AND STATE POWER IN JESSAMINE CHAN’S THE SCHOOL FOR GOOD MOTHERS. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(3 (s2), 763-780. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22032146