ECOLINGUISTIC FRAMING OF THE ANTHROPOCENE APOCALYPSE: AN ECO CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN-NATURE RELATIONSHIP IN THE ROAD BY MCCARTHY

Authors

  • Shehzad PhD Scholar, English (Linguistics), Southwest University, Chongqing, China. Author
  • Alleli Faith P. Leyritana MA in Education, Department of Education, Republic of Philippines. Author
  • Muhammad Afzal MS Scholar (English) University of Hertfordshire, England. Author
  • Laiba Shakeel MS English (Linguistics) Bahria University Karachi campus, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21207657

Keywords:

Anthropocene, Climate Fiction, Cormac McCarthy, Critical Discourse Analysis, Eco-criticism, Ecolinguistics, Ecological Framing, Environmental Discourse, The Road

Abstract

This study investigates the ecocritical ad ecolinguistic framing of the Anthropocene apocalypse in Cormac McCarthy's The Road by integrating Fairclough's three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with Stibbe's (2015) ecolinguistic framework. Using a qualitative interpretive research design, the study analyzes purposively selected textual passages having ecological devastation, environmental degradation, and interactions between humans and the natural world. The analysis is conducted across Fairclough's 3D model (1989) while employing Stibbe's (2015) concepts of framing, evaluation, salience, erasure, metaphor, identity, and"stories we live by" to analyze the ecological ideologies embedded within the narrative. The findings reveal that McCarthy constructs the post-apocalyptic landscape as a discourse of ecological exhaustion in which recurring representations of ash, silence, biodiversity loss, and environmental desolation challenge anthropocentric assumptions and expose the consequences of ecological exploitation. The novel systematically reframes the human–nature relationship by replacing narratives of human dominance and technological progress with an ecological worldview grounded in interdependence, vulnerability, and environmental responsibility. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that environmental collapse in The Road functions not merely as a fictional setting but as an ideological critique of unsustainable cultural narratives that characterize the Anthropocene. By integrating CDA with ecolinguistics, this research contributes to environmental literary discourse studies and ecolinguistic scholarship by offering a comprehensive analytical framework for examining ecological meanings in literary texts. The paper has international implications for it contributes to United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals SDG-13 (Climate Action) a discourse on environmental consciousness and encourages readers to critically reconsider humans’ relationship with the more-than-human world in the face of accelerating global ecological crises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, A. (2021). If we had a spaceship could we go there? The Road's critique of techno-futurism and anthropocentrism. English Studies, 102(5), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2021.1943896

Chen, A. (2025). The cold relentless circling of the intestate earth: The anthropomorphism of Earth and proleptic ecological mourning in Cormac McCarthy's The Road (2006). English Studies in Africa, 68(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138398.2025.2537549

Clark, N. (2017). Anthropocene bodies, geological time and the crisis of natality. Body & Society, 23(3), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X17716520

Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.

De Bruyn, B. (2010). Borrowed time, borrowed world and borrowed eyes: Care, ruin and vision in McCarthy's The

Road. English Studies, 91(7), 776–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2010.518045

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fill, A., & Penz, H. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.

McCarthy, C. (2006). The Road. Alfred A. Knopf.

McCarthy, C. (2006). The Road. Alfred A. Knopf.

McNenny, G. (2018). Framing the Anthropocene: Educating for sustainability. Language & Ecology.

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The

great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.

Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Shehzad, Alleli Faith P. Leyritana, Muhammad Afzal, & Laiba Shakeel. (2026). ECOLINGUISTIC FRAMING OF THE ANTHROPOCENE APOCALYPSE: AN ECO CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF HUMAN-NATURE RELATIONSHIP IN THE ROAD BY MCCARTHY. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(3 (s2), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21207657