PERFORMING GENDERED BELONGING IN THE WORKPLACE: AN INTERACTIONAL FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF PIXAR’S PURL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18896415Keywords:
Feminist Discourse Analysis, Gender Performativity, Interactional Sociolinguistics, Workplace Inclusion and Exclusion, Workplace InteractionAbstract
The analysis is based on the communicative mechanisms on a micro-level through which workplace inclusion and exclusion take place in an eight minutes Pixar animated short film Purl (2018) by relying on the dramaturgical sociology of Erving Goffman and the feminist discourse analysis of Sara Mills. The study, based on multimodal transcription and systematic discourse analysis of 14 interactional episodes, shows that gendered exclusion operates not by prevailing discrimination, but by the presence of latent interactional processes: systematic non-response, participation structure control, turn-taking marginalization, and negative assessment of feminine-coded interactional styles. The contribution of the study is theoretical, meaning that it proves that the frameworks of Goffman and Mills can be fruitfully combined, that exclusion has distinct interactional mechanisms, and that professional norms are naturalized. It methodologically lays the foundation of protocols of analysis of animated workplace stories and confirms intensive single case analysis. In practice, there is some evidence that meaningful inclusion in the workplace takes place when discourse norms are changed instead of having people trained to conform to norms that imply exclusion. The study contributes to the knowledge of the functioning of modern workplace inequality based on the daily communicative practice.
Downloads
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.
Ashcraft, K. L. (2011). Knowing work through the communication of difference: A revised agenda for difference studies. In D. K. Mumby (Ed.), Reframing difference in organizational communication studies (pp. 3-30). SAGE Publications.
Baxter, J. (2010). The language of female leadership. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M., & Freed, A. F. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice. Longman.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. SAGE Publications.
Cameron, D. (Ed.). (1997). The feminist critique of language: A reader (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Cameron, D., McAlinden, F., & O'Leary, K. (1988). Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities (pp. 74-93). Longman.
Catalyst. (2022). Women in the workforce: United States (Quick Take). https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-united-states/
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
Do Rozario, R. (2004). The princess and the magic kingdom: Beyond nostalgia, the function of the Disney princess. Women's Studies in Communication, 27(1), 34-59.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fishman, P. M. (1983). Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 89-101). Newbury House.
Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. MIT Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
Gentry, R., & Harrison, L. (2020). Using film as a creative arts method to explore workplace sexism. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 15(3), 291-309.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice Hall.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00206983
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Cornell University Press.
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for social research. SAGE Publications.
Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered talk at work: Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Blackwell.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Pearson Education.
Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. SAGE Publications.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). John Benjamins.
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617.
Kendall, S., & Tannen, D. (1997). Gender and language in the workplace. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 81-105). SAGE Publications.
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205-254.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. Harper & Row.
Lauzen, M. M., Dozier, D. M., & Horan, N. (2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(2), 200-214.
Lazar, M. M. (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, P. Y. (2003). "Said and done" versus "saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342-366.
McKinsey & Company. (2023). Women in the workplace 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace
Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. Routledge.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(2), 185-206.
Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge University Press.
Mullany, L. (2011). Frontstage and backstage: Gordon Brown, the "bigoted woman" and (im)politeness in the 2010 UK general election. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Ed.), Discursive approaches to politeness (pp. 179-208). De Gruyter Mouton.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). Academic Press.
Pauwels, A. (1998). Women changing language. Longman.
Pixar Animation Studios. (2019). Purl [Short film]. https://www.pixar.com/purl
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Sanders, M. S. (2019). The gendered workplace: A study of Pixar's Purl as organizational communication pedagogy. Communication Teacher, 33(4), 286-291.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., Prescott, A., & Pieper, K. (2012). Gender roles & occupations: A look at character attributes and job-related aspirations in film and television. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media.
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271-286.
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Ablex.
Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and men at work. William Morrow.
Towbin, M. A., Haddock, S. A., Zimmerman, T. S., Lund, L. K., & Tanner, L. R. (2004). Images of gender, race, age, and sexual orientation in Disney feature-length animated films. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 15(4), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v15n04_02
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283.
Wells, P. (2002). Animation: Genre and authorship. Wallflower Press.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102-117). Newbury House.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151.
Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1997). Gender and discourse. SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Newbury House.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Umm-e-Rooman Yaqoob (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
