EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF SFL-BASED ACTIVITIES ON ESL LEARNERS’ WRITING COMPETENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18761559Keywords:
ESL Writing, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Writing Competence, Learner Attitudes, SFL-Based ActivitiesAbstract
Writing competence is a fundamental component of second language proficiency, yet many ESL learners struggle to produce coherent, organized, and meaningful texts due to traditional grammar-focused instruction that overlooks the relationship between language, context, and purpose. Although Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) provides a meaning-centered framework for writing instruction, its classroom application remains underexplored in Pakistani secondary-level contexts, particularly in female government schools. This study investigates the impact of SFL-based writing activities on ESL learners’ overall writing competence, identifies specific aspects of writing that show improvement, and examines learners’ attitudes and perceptions toward this approach. Adopting a mixed-methods design, the research was conducted in government schools in Attock city with 120 female students from grades 9 and 10, using pre- and post-instruction writing samples and a closed-ended Yes/No questionnaire administered after a 14-day SFL-based instructional intervention. Qualitative analysis revealed a clear progression from basic and fragmented writing to structured, coherent, and meaningful paragraphs, with noticeable improvements in meaning-making, audience awareness, and textual coherence, while quantitative findings indicated strong positive responses regarding writing competence, confidence, and course recommendation, though grammatical accuracy remained a challenge. Overall, the study demonstrates that SFL-based writing activities effectively enhance ESL learners’ writing competence and motivation and offers valuable implications for ESL pedagogy, curriculum design, and context-sensitive writing instruction.
Downloads
References
Apridayani, A., Han, W., & Sakkanayok, K. (2024). Enhancing English writing competence in higher education: A comparative study of teacher-only assessment versus teacher and student self-assessment approaches. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00263-3
Bhowmik, S., & Kim, M. (2022). ESL writing instruction in K‑12 settings: Pedagogical approaches and classroom techniques. In Language and Literacy Researchers of Canada (pp. 174–197). https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29612
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(3), 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311669829
https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b40623245
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemic_functional_linguistics
https://saima.ai/blog/What-is-English-as-a-Second-Language-ESL
Moffett, J. (1981). Teaching the universe of discourse (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED203369). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED203369.pdf
Nawaz, M., Hussain, S. A., & Qureshi, F. S. (2022). An investigative study of Pakistani ESL secondary school students’ perceptions and teachers’ practices of written corrective feedback in writing class. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language (PJSEL), 9(1), 341–352. https://www.pjsel.jehanf.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1065
Raza, H., Sarwar, M. S., & Qasim, H. M. (2025). Cohesion in ESL argumentative essays: An SFL analysis of university students’ writing across Punjab. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 9(1), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2025(9-I)52
Shuck, Gail. (2013). "What is ESL?". A Rhetoric for Writing Program Administrators, 64-76. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/english_facpubs/260/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qura-Tul-Ain Sajjad, Javeria Nissa, Nomana Anjum, Muhammad Junaid Zafar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
