INVESTIGATING GREED IN IBSEN’S HEDDA GABLER: A MARXIST STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18396169Keywords:
Marxist Literary Criticism, Capitalism and Alienation, Class Struggle, Bourgeois Ideology, Modernity, Social DecayAbstract
This study conducts a Marxist critique of Henrik Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler (1891), positing the play as a prescient analysis of the socio-psychological consequences of capitalist expansion. Moving beyond conventional psychological readings, the argument centers on greed not as an individual flaw but as a systemic byproduct of class dynamics. The analysis traces how bourgeois accumulation and the alienation of the proletariat during industrialization establish a template for exploitation that is subsequently internalized by the ascendant working class. Through the characters of Hedda Gabler, Jørgen Tesman, and Ejlert Løvborg, the drama delineates a cyclical transfer of avarice: the bourgeoisie, in its decline, exhibits moral decay, while the educated proletariat, upon gaining agency, replicates the very oppressive behaviors it once endured. This mirroring results in the corrosion of familial structures, emotional bonds, and individual sanity. The paper concludes that Ibsen’s work anticipates the enduring pathology of late capitalism—a condition defined by pervasive alienation and the destruction of communal integrity in the pursuit of material and social capital. Thus, Hedda Gabler is reframed as a critical lens through which to examine the persistent crises of modernity.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Diamond, J. (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Press.
Drucker, P. (1993) Post-Capitalist Society. New York: HarperBusiness.
Durbach, E. (1971) ‘The Apotheosis of Hedda Gabler’, Scandinavian Studies, 43(2), pp. 143–156.
Eagleton, T. (2005) The English Novel: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Engels, F. (1845) The Condition of the Working Class in England. Leipzig: Otto Wigand.
Fromm, E. (1976) To Have or To Be? New York: Harper & Row.
Galbraith, J.K. (1958) The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gilman, S. (1999) ‘Hedda’s Silences: Beauty and Destruction in Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler’, Modern Drama, 42(3), pp. 341–360.
Hoggart, R. (1957) The Uses of Literacy. London: Chatto & Windus.
Holm, I. (2015) ‘Hedda Gabler and the Uses of Beauty’, Ibsen Studies, 15(1), pp. 45–62.
Marx, K. (1865) Value, Price and Profit. London: International Publishing.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848) The Communist Manifesto. London: Workers’ Educational Association.
Robinson, L. (1983) ‘Race, Class, and Gender in To Kill a Mockingbird’, The Southern Quarterly, 21(4), pp. 50–65.
Sennett, R. and Cobb, J. (1972) The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: Knopf.
Showalter, E. (2001) ‘Hedda Gabler: The Woman in the Cage’, in A Literature of Their Own. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 245–270.
Stiglitz, J. (2019) People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: W.W. Norton.
Templeton, J. (1997) ‘The Doll House Backlash: Criticism, Feminism, and Ibsen’, PMLA, 104(1), pp. 28–40.
Weigand, H. (2001) ‘The Two Symbols in Hedda Gabler’, The Tulane Drama Review, 5(3), pp. 79–85.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamal Shabab Ahmad (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
