ECOLINGUISTICS AND CLIMATE CHANGE DISCOURSE: THE POWER OF LANGUAGE IN SHAPING ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION

Authors

  • Ammara Fatima MPhil English Literature, Department of English language and Literature, Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Asma Naeem BS in English Language & Literature, Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan. Author
  • Kinza Batool College of Foreign Studies, Department of English Language and Literature, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19667074

Keywords:

Climate Change, Discourse, Ecolinguistics, Environmental Action, Metaphors and Framing

Abstract

The present study analyses the contribution of language based on the ecolinguistic approach to the development of social cognition and reaction to climate change.  It emphasizes the role of language decisions, metaphors, and stories in building specific understandings of the world that affect perceptions of the environment and actions.  The study follows the qualitative research method based on the theory of ecolinguistics. It explores climate-related discourses in various settings, including the way language constructs ecological realities and the urgency or lack thereof, as well as encouragement or discouragement of action. The results of the study demonstrate that language not only mirrors but also guides environmental consciousness. The use of such terms as “climate crisis” and “global emergency” makes it more urgent, whereas metaphors, such as the “planet is a shared home”, make it feel more shared and, hence, have collective responsibility. The paper has found that ecolinguistics offers a valuable insight into the persuasive nature of the discourse and its moral implications for sustainability. The role of linguistic strategies in making or breaking climate action is brought into the light. This study highlights the relevance of mindful communication in solving the ecological crisis. It also recommends that the new digital and grassroots discourses be investigated in future studies to enhance environmental activism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.

Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726.

Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics. Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press

Hasbún-Mancilla, J. O., Aldunce-Ide, P. P., Blanco-Wells, G., & Browne-Sartori, R. (2017). Framing climate change in Chile: discourse analysis in digital media. Convergencia, 24(74), 161-186.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81.

Nerlich, B., & Jaspal, R. (2012). Metaphors we die by? Geoengineering, metaphors, and the argument from catastrophe. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 131–147.

Penz, H., & Fill, A. (2022). Ecolinguistics: History, today, and tomorrow. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 232-253.

Stibbe, A. (2014). An ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(1), 117–128.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Stibbe, A. (2021). Stories of resistance: Ecolinguistics in action. Bloomsbury.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458

Wang Q. (2018). The Ecological Discourse Analysis of Advertisement from a Systemic Functional Perspective— A Case Study of Advertisement of Children’s Milk. Journal of Shaoguan University, 58, 43–57.

Zhdanava, A., Kaur, S., & Rajandran, K. (2021). Representing non-human animals as equals: An ecolinguistic analysis of vegan campaigns. Journal of World Languages, 7(1), 26-57.

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Ammara Fatima, Asma Naeem, & Kinza Batool. (2026). ECOLINGUISTICS AND CLIMATE CHANGE DISCOURSE: THE POWER OF LANGUAGE IN SHAPING ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. International Premier Journal of Languages & Literature, 4(1), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19667074